Bulletin April/May 2013 (ASIS&T)
Citation counts have long been the tried and true measure of academic research usage and impact. Specifically, published articles in prominent journals citing other published articles in other prominent journals equate to prestige and tenure. This scheme for determining impact was developed in the 1960s, and while so much else about collecting and disseminating information has changed since that time, the citation count mechanism continues to dominate the way research is evaluated. Yet, there are many well-known problems with this system.
Ciarán Quinn, Research Support Librarian & Librarian for the Research Institutes, Maynooth University. email@example.com
Thursday, 17 October 2013
Are Alternative Metrics Still Alternative? by Mike Buschman and Andrea Michalek
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
The Metric Tide Revisited
As part of FRAP (The Future Research Assessment Programme), an expert panel has been invited to lead a review of the role of metrics in res...
Powers of Ten. Based on the film by Charles and Ray Eames. An Eames Office Website Powers of Ten takes us on an adventure in magnitudes. S...
A significant pool of funding has been designated to ramp up Ireland’s progress in implementing an open research ecosystem. This funding ma...
Post a Comment