Peer Review : Debate : Nature
Peer review is commonly accepted as an essential part of scientific publication. But the ways peer review is put into practice vary across journals and disciplines. What is the best method of peer review? Is it truly a value-adding process? What are the ethical concerns? And how can new technology be used to improve traditional models?
This Nature web debate consists of 22 articles of analyses and perspectives from leading scientists, publishers and other stakeholders to address these questions. Key links and relevant articles from their archive are listed.
CiarĂ¡n Quinn, Research Librarian, Maynooth University. ciaran.quinn@mu.ie
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Open Access in the European Research Area: progress remains uneven as new report calls for more concerted action
A new independent expert report published today by the European Commission highlights that, despite notable advancement, the implementation...
-
Responding to the growing momentum of movements, such as DORA and CoARA, Giovanni Abramo argues for a more nuanced balance between the use o...
-
The Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2023 include 1,799 universities across 104 countries and regions, making them the lar...
No comments:
Post a Comment