As the REF submission period ends, mismatched publishing incentives signal challenging times ahead in academia.
Academics are frequently subject to new types of evaluations. November marks the end of the submission process for the UK funding council’s evaluation, the Research Excellence Framework (REF). John Hudson discusses some of the shortcomings of the REF and the methods individual papers are ranked. New evaluations and requirements change the incentives of economists and can affect their research – sometimes not for the better.
CiarĂ¡n Quinn, Research Support Librarian & Librarian for the Research Institutes, Maynooth University. ciaran.quinn@mu.ie
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Research evaluation should be pragmatic, not a choice between peer review and metrics
Responding to the growing momentum of movements, such as DORA and CoARA, Giovanni Abramo argues for a more nuanced balance between the use o...
-
Extinctions of large animals sever the Earth's 'nutrient arteries' A new study has demonstrated that large animals have acted...
-
TED: Ideas worth spreading
No comments:
Post a Comment