Peer Review : Debate : Nature
Peer review is commonly accepted as an essential part of scientific publication. But the ways peer review is put into practice vary across journals and disciplines. What is the best method of peer review? Is it truly a value-adding process? What are the ethical concerns? And how can new technology be used to improve traditional models?
This Nature web debate consists of 22 articles of analyses and perspectives from leading scientists, publishers and other stakeholders to address these questions. Key links and relevant articles from their archive are listed.
CiarĂ¡n Quinn, Research Support Librarian & Librarian for the Research Institutes, Maynooth University. ciaran.quinn@mu.ie
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
New Funding of €1.725 Million Positions Ireland to Lead in Open Research
A significant pool of funding has been designated to ramp up Ireland’s progress in implementing an open research ecosystem. This funding ma...
-
This useful guide from the MU Research Development Office will bring you through the process of finding funding, preparing your proposal, p...
-
The Max Planck Society, an enormous German research organization 14,000 scientists strong and comprising multiple research institutes, has e...
No comments:
Post a Comment