Bias against novelty in science | VOX, CEPR’s Policy Portal
There is growing concern that funding agencies supporting scientific research are increasingly risk-averse, favouring safe projects at the expense of novel projects exploring untested approaches. This column uses the citation trajectories for over 1 million research papers to examine the impact profile of novel research. Novel papers tend to suffer from delayed impact, but are more likely to become big hits in the long run and to generate follow-up research. The short time windows of the bibliometric indicators that are increasingly used by funding agencies in their decision-making may bias funding decisions against novelty.
CiarĂ¡n Quinn, Research Support Librarian & Librarian for the Research Institutes, Maynooth University. ciaran.quinn@mu.ie
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
World University Rankings 2023
The Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2023 include 1,799 universities across 104 countries and regions, making them the lar...
-
Entrez cross-database search Entrez is NCBI’s primary text search and retrieval system that integrates the PubMed database of biomedical ...
-
In this interesting piece Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe reviews the feedback submitted in response to the Plan S consultation and highlights 7 the...
No comments:
Post a Comment